Alcanzando Metas Foundation

 

Characteristics of Latinos in the District of Columbia

The following information describes the characteristics of Latinos in the District of Columbia by different areas. Information published in this section has been taken from the US Census and research conducted by the District's Council on Latino Agencies (CLA), a non-profit organization representing several community organizations based in Washington, DC. CLA has granted OLA permission to publish this information:

Health

On average, DC Latinos are poorer, less likely to have health insurance, and less likely to utilize health care services than other District residents. Latinos compare favorably on some measures of health, including life expectancy, birth outcomes, and incidence of heart disease and cancer, but fare less well on other measures, such as prevalence of diabetes, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS. Evidence suggests that as Latinos acculturate to a US lifestyle they abandon many healthful practices and do not access preventive health care services, which may eventually lead to mortality and disease patterns that correlate to those of non-Latinos. Latino immigration to Washington has had a notable impact on the city's health care delivery and financing system; 38 percent of non-elderly Latinos are uninsured. However, the Alliance program has clearly benefited a large number of uninsured Latinos in recent years. Community health programs and clinics compensate for mainstream health services that are often neither financially nor culturally accessible to immigrants. District government is working diligently to meet the increasing need for health services in the Latino community. Research has found notable characteristics in the area of health for Latinos, including, but not limited to: 

  • Sex, age, and income correlates of Latinos' health status
  • Acculturation erodes Latinos' healthful lifestyle factors
  • Latina women and infant health outcomes are more favorable despite inadequate prenatal care
  • Latinos are at high risk for communicable diseases
  • Substance abuse and mental health possibly linked to degree of acculturation
  • Environmental health concerns focus on lead poisoning
  • Availability and utilization of health services determined by cost, location, and language access
  • Financial barriers to health services means lower insurance and Medicaid coverage for Latinos
  • Immigration barriers to health services create anxiety
  • Linguistic and cultural barriers to health services further compromise services delivery 
Housing
 
Following the 1991 Mount Pleasant disturbances, the DC Latino Civil Rights Task Force identified the lack of available, quality housing as one of the key problems that fueled the riots. Ten years later, housing conditions and access to services have deteriorated in some areas, and many leaders say the affordable housing is the most serious and overarching threat to the Latino community. Throughout the nation, low-income Latino households face the worst case housing needs—they do not receive federal housing assistance, they pay more than 50 percent of their income for rent, and they earn less than half of the area's median family income. The number of DC renter households with incomes below the poverty line exceeds by 16 percent the number of afforable housing units. Many Latino families live below the poverty line, and while financially eligible for housing programs, they encounter many barriers, including language isolation and the District's limited supply of affordable housing. City agencies are exploring strategies to address the future potential redevelopment to deteriorated and vacant housing stock, expand mortage markets, and promote transitions from crisis to permanent housing. Research has found gaps and suggested strategies in the area of housing, including, but not limited to: 
  • Housing conditions for DC Latinos are overcrowded and costly
  • Gentrification and displacement continue in Ward One Latino neighborhoods
  • Housing affordability and availability have declined precipitously in the District
  • Homeownership in the Latino community can anchor neighborhood revitalization efforts
Education
 
Latino enrollment in the District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS) has almost doubled since the late 1980s and steady immigration to the region continues to transform the racial, ethnic, and linguistic characteristics of neighborhoods and schools. District schools are among the first public institutions that new immigrants engage in, and are therefore instrumental in helping immigrants integrate and become productive citizens. In the last 10 years, DCPS has devoted considerable effort and capital to school reform to improve academic standards, implement innovative in-school and after-school programs, and provide alternative paths to success for students most at risk for dropping out. Nevertheless, the Latino community confronts multiple barriers to student success, including under-schooling and limited English proficiency of both parents and students, inconsistent application of language assessment policies, and limited bilingual education. Making DCPS reforms equally successful for Latinos will require additional strategies. First, schools should be viewed as learning communities where students come first and where learning opportunities are accessible and responsive to the linguistic and cultural needs to all students. Teachers must demonstrate the skills and cultural knowledge to work effectively with all students. Assessment and accountability systems that include accurate data collection and reporting need to be in place to allow staff to reflect on their work and improve their performance. Finally, schools need to reach out to Latino parents and help them become effective partners in the children's education. Research has found notable areas for improvement in education among Latinos, including, but not limited to: 
  • Latino student performance and drop-out rates remain troubling
  • Immigrant children face challenging transitions
  • Language assessment helps students, parents, and teachers
  • Language and cultural misunderstandings create barriers to Latino students' achievement
  • Latino students and parents can maximize the use of additional services
  • Preparing teachers, principals, and counselors to work effectively with Latino students 
Employment
 
The rapid growth of Latino workers in the Washington Metropolitan area, coupled with Latino business entrepreneurship, demonstrate the importance of Latinos to the District's economy. In 1997, 337 firms wewe Latino-owned, employing over 4,300 workers and generating more than $600 million in goods and services. Nearly two-thirds of these enterprises were owned by Central or South Americans, and roughly the small percentage of firms were in the service trades. However, since 1990 most Latino workers have remained in lower paying occupations, often working part-time with no employer benefits or job security. Labor markets are increasingly metropolitan in scale, and District residents—at all education and skill levels—must compete with workers from suburbs for jobs in the region. Increasingly, entry-level jobs are located in the suburbs, and central city residents—few of whom own cars—are not gaining access to the full range of opportunities that the region offers. Distance, however, is not the only obstacle facing Latino workers in the District or the neighborhoods in which they live. Programs targeted to these comunities are identifying and addressing the full range of barriers to employment and upward mobility, including lack of basic skills, lack of information about job openings, and discrimination. Research has found notable characteristics and areas for improvement among Latinos, including, but not limited to: 
  • Employment, unemployment and wages vary by ethnicity
  • Working conditions and employment opportunities are further restricted by federal employer sanctions
  • Linking central city Latinos to entry-level job openings


   

 Focus on Women and Girls?

A report by the National Center for Education Standards, Trends in Educational Equity of Girls and Women (2000), noted that in fourth grade the number of girls and boys who like math and science is about the same, but by eighth grade twice as many boys as girls show an interest in these subjects. Research by other respected organizations, such as the National Science Foundation, reports similar findings.

A number of factors contribute to this inequity, including:

  • Societal stereotypes consistently convey messages that science is for boys, not girls.
  • Boys receive much more praise for their academic contributions than girls. Girls often receive praise for being well behaved, organized, on time, or neat.
  • Many believe science to be a field of study in which an eccentric man works alone in a lab. Why would a girl aspire to that career objective?

Recognizing the importance of the contributions of women in science, the WAS project is focused on encouraging girls to be young scientists. To help engage girls in science in the classroom and at home, consider focusing on the following:

  • Creativity: Sketching and the use of color in data collection and representation are motivating and remind all young scientists that data representation comes in many forms.
  • Collaboration: Working together with peers and/or adults is often motivating to young female scientists, and it can demonstrate that scientific work benefits from multiple perspectives.
  • Visible Female Participation: When you choose a volunteer in class, select girls just as often as (or more often than) boys. Make sure to engage volunteers in meaningful academic efforts, not simply serving as the scribe at the whiteboard.
  • Encouragement: Praise girls for their intellectual contributions—not solely their nice coloring, handwriting, or timeliness.
  • Positive Representation: Have many discussions about how and where scientists really work—collaboratively in all kinds of settings!


 


 

Neighborhood Profiles

Neighborhood Clusters

There are 39 neighborhood clusters throughout the city, each made up of three to five neighborhoods. Neighborhood clusters are being used by the D.C. government for budgeting, planning, service delivery, and analysis purposes.

If you are not sure which Neighborhood Cluster you're interested in, you can look it up for a specific address at the DC Atlas: http://citizenatlas.dc.gov/atlasapps/reporthometab.aspx.

To see data for a Neighborhood Cluster, select one from the links below or scroll over the map to select the area that interests you.

Cluster 16
 Cluster 10
Cluster 17
Cluster 19
 Cluster 11
 Cluster 18
 Cluster 12
Cluster 20
 Cluster 13
 Cluster 15
 Cluster 14  Cluster 2
Cluster 22
 Cluster 21
Cluster 24
 Cluster 1
 Cluster 3
 Cluster 4
Cluster 23 Cluster 29
 Cluster 6  Cluster 7
 Cluster 5  Cluster 8  Cluster 30 Cluster 31
cluster 25
 Cluster 32
Cluster 26
 Cluster 33
Cluster 9
Cluster 27  Cluster 34
 Cluster 28
 Cluster 35
 Cluster 37
 Cluster 36
 Cluster 38
 Cluster 39
  • Cluster 1:  Kalorama Heights, Adams Morgan, Lanier Heights
  • Cluster 2:  Columbia Heights, Mt. Pleasant, Pleasant Plains, Park View
  • Cluster 3:  Howard University, Le Droit Park, Cardozo/Shaw
  • Cluster 4:  Georgetown, Burleith/Hillandale
  • Cluster 5:  West End, Foggy Bottom, GWU
  • Cluster 6:  Dupont Circle, Connecticut Avenue/K Street
  • Cluster 7:  Shaw, Logan Circle
  • Cluster 8:  Downtown, Chinatown, Penn Quarters, Mount Vernon Square, North Capitol Street
  • Cluster 9:  Southwest Employment Area, Southwest/Waterfront, Fort McNair, Buzzard Point
  • Cluster 10:  Hawthorne, Barnaby Woods, Chevy Chase
  • Cluster 11:  Friendship Heights, American University Park, Tenleytown
  • Cluster 12:  North Cleveland Park, Forest Hills, Van Ness
  • Cluster 13:  Spring Valley, Palisades, Wesley Heights, Foxhall Crescent, Foxhall Village, Georgetown Reservoir
  • Cluster 14:  Cathedral Heights, McLean Gardens, Glover Park
  • Cluster 15:  Cleveland Park, Woodley Park, Massachusetts Avenue Heights, Woodland-Normanstone Terrace
  • Cluster 16:  Colonial Village, Shepherd Park, North Portal Estates
  • Cluster 17:  Takoma, Brightwood, Manor Park
  • Cluster 18:  Brightwood Park, Crestwood, Petworth
  • Cluster 19:  Lamond Riggs, Queens Chapel, Fort Totten, Pleasant Hill
  • Cluster 20:  North Michigan Park, Michigan Park, University Heights
  • Cluster 21:  Edgewood, Bloomingdale, Truxton Circle, Eckington
  • Cluster 22:  Brookland, Brentwood, Langdon
  • Cluster 23:  Ivy City, Arboretum, Trinidad, Carver Langston
  • Cluster 24:  Woodridge, Fort Lincoln, Gateway
  • Cluster 25:  Union Station, Stanton Park, Kingman Park
  • Cluster 26:  Capitol Hill, Lincoln Park
  • Cluster 27:  Near Southeast, Navy Yard
  • Cluster 28:  Historic Anacostia
  • Cluster 29:  Eastland Gardens, Kenilworth
  • Cluster 30:  Mayfair, Hillbrook, Mahaning Heights
  • Cluster 31:  Deanwood, Burrville, Grant Park, Lincoln Heights, Fairmont Heights
  • Cluster 32:  River Terrace, Benning, Greenway, Fort Dupont
  • Cluster 33:  Capitol View, Marshall Heights, Benning Heights
  • Cluster 34:  Twining, Fairlawn, Randle Highlands, Penn Branch, Fort Davis Park, Dupont Park
  • Cluster 35:  Fairfax Village, Naylor Gardens, Hillcrest, Summit Park
  • Cluster 36:  Woodland/Fort Stanton, Garfield Heights, Knox Hill
  • Cluster 37:  Sheridan, Barry Farm, Buena Vista
  • Cluster 38:  Douglass, Shipley Terrace
  • Cluster 39:  Congress Heights, Bellevue, Washington Highlands


City | Wards | ANCs | Neighborhood Clusters | PSAs | ZIP codes | Census Tracts | Comparison Tables

About Us >  Community Need


Alcanzando Metas Foundation 700 12th Street Suite 700 Washington DC Phone:202-250-0887 email
info@ametas.org

Copyright 2006 © Alcanzando Metas Foundation